Jim Fetzer, Dennis Cimino and Dean Hartwell, all of whom will speak at the upcoming Vancouver Hearings in June, have written three articles on Veterans Today that demolish the official 9/11 theory.
Read the articles here:
9/11: Planes/No Planes and "Video Fakery" by Fetzer makes the case against the use of passenger planes as weapons on 9/11 as clear as I have ever seen. It also shows how fakery was used to deceive a gullible public.
9/11: The Official Account of the Pentagon Attack is a Fantasy by Cimino and Fetzer tells us the true story of what happened at the Pentagon by knocking out the official story.
The 9/11 Passenger Paradox: What Happened to Flight 93? by Hartwell and Fetzer answers that perplexing question with the use of circumstantial evidence and logic.
Forget about the official theory. It has been "sacked" by this blitz of essays and the ball is loose! Come to the Vancouver Hearings and watch the whole team score a touchdown!
Those who oppose the official theory about 9/11 are split over whether planes were used.
The “no planers” contend that no planes hit the World Trade Center, the Pentagon or Shanksville (and some go as far as to say that no planes were used at all). So they do not believe passengers died at the respective “crash” sites.
What is significant about the issue of whether passengers died at each site?
As part of the official theory, the assertion that people died in the crashes authorizes the government to pay out to the families. This would be the routine payout of Social Security benefits and the special “Victim Compensation Fund.”
However, very few families have opted for the Fund.
No debris at any “crash” scene has ever been traced back to any of the planes. Two of the flights were not scheduled and did not take off on 9/11. The other two flights have been tracked miles away from their “crash” scenes AFTER the crashes supposedly took place!
Yet the “planers” make ad hominem attacks against those who follow the facts.
Is there any connection between the “planers” and the families of the “victims”?
The official story of hijackers taking over planes on 9/11 and crashing them into buildings is based on two phone calls that never happened. Barbara Olson never called her husband, Ted (pictured above), and Todd Beamer never called Lisa Jefferson, a Verizon phone representative.
We know, thanks to David Ray Griffin and others, that the FBI remained silent when the original media stories came out about passengers using cell phones to make numerous calls.
And we know that the FBI, confronted by evidence from AK Dewdney and others that cell phone calls do not work on planes in flight, provided a new official version of the calls by labeling all but two of them air phone calls in a report for the Moussaoui trial in 2006.
At that trial, the FBI quietly admitted that Olson had made one call that was “unconnected.”
As for Beamer, the same records show him making his call to Jefferson and another call from the same phone AT THE SAME SECOND!
And the call to Jefferson went on for OVER AN HOUR, long past the time of the “crash.”
Lisa Jefferson, who reportedly took Beamer’s call, failed to write down the start time of the call. So we could not verify when the call actually started, even if we were to agree that it did.
There was no need to get either Barbara Olson or Todd Beamer to make these calls, to use imposters or voice “morphing.” What was needed was for someone to contact Ted Olson and Lisa Jefferson and convince them to relay what we now call the official story to the media.
Someone, perhaps an insider, could have contacted Olson and told him:
“Ted, we need a favor. And if you know what is good for you, you will do it for us. Just get a hold of CNN and tell them you received a call from your wife earlier today. Your story is simple: your wife was on one of those hijacked planes and she told you…”
Someone could have called Verizon, gotten to Jefferson, and run a similar story:
“Lisa, listen to me closely. Your country needs you to deliver a message from a passenger on one of those planes, United 93. You work with his widow and you give the media a hero who fought back against those terrorists and your job is safe…”
What about the other alleged calls?
Few of them, if any, can be confirmed. Valid questions about consistencies between calls and questionable statements have arisen to challenge the authenticity of each.
The manner of communication matters little as all of the “calls” promoted the same incorrect information as the “calls” from Olson and Beamer. There is every reason to believe that similar tactics could have been used in creating more false calls.
Without the fake calls, we would have no word on hijackers, knives, box cutters, red bandanas, imminent plane crashes, etc. Who would our leaders have blamed for what happened?
Ted Olson and Lisa Jefferson were two people caught in a dilemma between the story they knew to be true and the story they were urged and even coerced to promote. History is rarely written by those who stand and collect the facts. It is written with fear of the future.
Dean Hartwell will speak at the Vancouver Hearings in June. To learn more about what he will speak about, click here.
Dean Hartwell keeps pursuing the truth about those who govern us.