When I was a child, my parents would hide a gift for me in a large room. When I would walk away from the area where the gift lay, my parents would say “cold!” When I would walk toward it, they would say “warm!” until I got real close to the gift, whereupon they would say “hot!”
What I seek now is the truth about 9/11 and related events. The gift is the full proof of what happened and justice for those who planned and carried it out.
If I am correct, though, those in power are the same people who perpetrated the crime and they therefore know where the gift lies. They can, through their contact with much of the media, manipulate those who search for the hidden gift. I trusted my parents to give me the correct hints about where it was.
Those in power – our politicians, much of the media and the wealthy interests who support them, have long since wanted us to abandon questioning the official theory of 9/11. After the official report came out in 2004, for example, only a few members of Congress have said they see any need for a new investigation.
If I am correct, the truth is out there and there is a chance it will eventually slip out. So those in power have to be careful how they deal with this opposition. The best way to control opponents is to convince them to chase issues of relatively little importance and keep them away from the issues that, if revealed, would undermine the ability of the powerful to remain in control.
Issues of relatively little importance likely targeted by those in power as “decoys” are the cause of collapse of the World Trade Center and the identification of what hit the Pentagon. While these issues matter to determining what really happened that day, neither gets to the root of how the event was planned and carried out, nor the identity of who did it, the most important question of all.
We must listen to our own voice, our intuition, and ask the right questions. These questions form the basis of the whole event. There is nothing more basic to the official 9/11 story than airplanes, hijackers and passengers. Those who have questioned the existence of any of these three basic ingredients of the story, especially the airplanes, have been ridiculed in the media (namely the Internet media) as “no planers.”
The idea that planes were not used may not have even caught the attention of many people. In watching the replays, the public collectively expressed its shock when it saw the figure of the planes hit the towers and then vented its anger at the “terrorists.” It was time to drop the bombs and then send troops over “there” to teach “them” a lesson. The voice of those in power had no trouble convincing most people to look away from the truth.
Those in power likely knew that most people will react to hearing about traumatic events in this manner. Most people do not react with inquisitiveness. Nor do many prepare ahead of time to hear about traumatic events by studying history. It is this small group of people that those who ponder “no planes” fit inside and it is they who get special treatment from the liars in power.
Through the media, those in power use their voice to call no-planers other names as well: like “disinformation agents.” What better way to mislead others who question 9/11 than by labeling the ones who are on to something in this manner? The ultimate truth may thus be covered up brilliantly because most people will be discouraged from even mentioning ideas that would lead to it.
So here we are. It has been nine years and we continue to use the military to solve the problem of 9/11. We have needed the detective skills of a Sherlock Holmes who would probably tell us it is time to re-visit the crime scene and ask the questions that people were too scared to ask before. We have needed our own knowledge of history – of the lies those in power have told us about the Gulf of Tonkin Incident, the slogan “Remember the Maine” and the “spot” resolutions that led to the Mexican-American War.
And before we get caught up going down the road of believing that all of our elections are free and fair or that the next terrorist incident was conducted by a terrorist, we ought to ignore the voice of those who are so willing to lead us on.
What I seek now is the truth about 9/11 and related events. The gift is the full proof of what happened and justice for those who planned and carried it out.
If I am correct, though, those in power are the same people who perpetrated the crime and they therefore know where the gift lies. They can, through their contact with much of the media, manipulate those who search for the hidden gift. I trusted my parents to give me the correct hints about where it was.
Those in power – our politicians, much of the media and the wealthy interests who support them, have long since wanted us to abandon questioning the official theory of 9/11. After the official report came out in 2004, for example, only a few members of Congress have said they see any need for a new investigation.
If I am correct, the truth is out there and there is a chance it will eventually slip out. So those in power have to be careful how they deal with this opposition. The best way to control opponents is to convince them to chase issues of relatively little importance and keep them away from the issues that, if revealed, would undermine the ability of the powerful to remain in control.
Issues of relatively little importance likely targeted by those in power as “decoys” are the cause of collapse of the World Trade Center and the identification of what hit the Pentagon. While these issues matter to determining what really happened that day, neither gets to the root of how the event was planned and carried out, nor the identity of who did it, the most important question of all.
We must listen to our own voice, our intuition, and ask the right questions. These questions form the basis of the whole event. There is nothing more basic to the official 9/11 story than airplanes, hijackers and passengers. Those who have questioned the existence of any of these three basic ingredients of the story, especially the airplanes, have been ridiculed in the media (namely the Internet media) as “no planers.”
The idea that planes were not used may not have even caught the attention of many people. In watching the replays, the public collectively expressed its shock when it saw the figure of the planes hit the towers and then vented its anger at the “terrorists.” It was time to drop the bombs and then send troops over “there” to teach “them” a lesson. The voice of those in power had no trouble convincing most people to look away from the truth.
Those in power likely knew that most people will react to hearing about traumatic events in this manner. Most people do not react with inquisitiveness. Nor do many prepare ahead of time to hear about traumatic events by studying history. It is this small group of people that those who ponder “no planes” fit inside and it is they who get special treatment from the liars in power.
Through the media, those in power use their voice to call no-planers other names as well: like “disinformation agents.” What better way to mislead others who question 9/11 than by labeling the ones who are on to something in this manner? The ultimate truth may thus be covered up brilliantly because most people will be discouraged from even mentioning ideas that would lead to it.
So here we are. It has been nine years and we continue to use the military to solve the problem of 9/11. We have needed the detective skills of a Sherlock Holmes who would probably tell us it is time to re-visit the crime scene and ask the questions that people were too scared to ask before. We have needed our own knowledge of history – of the lies those in power have told us about the Gulf of Tonkin Incident, the slogan “Remember the Maine” and the “spot” resolutions that led to the Mexican-American War.
And before we get caught up going down the road of believing that all of our elections are free and fair or that the next terrorist incident was conducted by a terrorist, we ought to ignore the voice of those who are so willing to lead us on.
RSS Feed
