A Lot about a Little - Dean T. Hartwell's Site
  • Home
  • Planes without Passengers
  • WTC7
  • Jury Duty
  • MOTION DISMISSED!
  • Essays
  • Testimonials
  • Contact

In the First Place: Why Public Debate Is Usually Pointless

6/6/2014

4 Comments

 
Picture
What are the pillars of our society?

Those who make decisions on our behalf, those who enforce those decisions and those who report them to us:

Government
Churches
The military
The media

They are all institutions whose existences are based on beliefs they do not accept
any dissension from.

Government – we are legitimate and all of our actions are legitimate
Churches – our dogma is correct and you will be punished in the next life if you disobey
The military – our wars are justified and you are not patriotic if you say otherwise
The media – what we say is true, we hide nothing important and if you disagree, you are a nut.

The institutions control public discussion by labeling thoughts that would harm their existence.  The following questions will never be answered by any of these pillars:

Government – What is national security and what types of information are really hidden to the public for this reason?
Churches – Can you prove that the leader of your religion really existed?
The military – How many soldiers would you recruit if you told them the truth about why we were sending them to war?
The media – How often are you pressured into dropping stories and who pressures you?

To get these questions answered, we need another actor to join the debate.  Many fear the institutions and their enormous power and do not ask why our society functions as it does.
  
But we need the questions answered.

Almost every debate, whether about something like guns (especially in light of recent reported shootings in the national news) or butter (like the perpetual debate of how much money to devote to the military) starts off with at least one of the false beliefs stated above.  In short, the debate gets it wrong IN THE FIRST PLACE.

Be a part of a public that reasonably questions what we hear.  Disregard those who state beliefs but do not back them up or who refuse to answer your questions.  This is how we collectively will get these questions answered.  Then we can discuss the details.

4 Comments

Would You Want Someone to Break Your Contract?

7/11/2012

1 Comment

 
Recently, the City of San Bernardino declared bankruptcy.  Already news analysts are speculating that there will be cuts in pensions to some of the city employees as a way of bringing the city out of its fiscal crisis.  Other cities voted to curb pension benefits in recent elections.

Why is the possibility of cutting pensions for public employees an issue?

First of all, PERS is a contract between the state of California and many of public employees in the state.

The key constitutional issues of the state changing the terms of the PERS contract are the Contracts Clause and the Takings Clause (5th and 14th Amendments of the Federal Constitution):

Contracts Clause - “No state shall…pass any law impairing the Obligation of Contracts”

Takings Clause – if the state interferes with property rights (such as wages or pension), it may be required to provide “just compensation.”

The first question in a court case of this type is whether the contract was whether the breaking of the contract caused participants to the contract trouble in preparing for retirement, difficulty in paying bills, etc.

If the court concludes that contract was broken to that extent, the court next considers whether the impairment served an important government purpose, such as the protection of its citizens from harm.

A court considers whether the law was foreseeable or even plausible at the time the contract was made.  It can also take into consideration that when the state is faced with a budgetary deficit, the legislature has many alternatives available to it, such as reducing state services not governed by contract and raising taxes.

If the impairment to the contract is not really necessary to protect the citizens, the court will rule in favor of those who brought suit on the impairment of contract (i.e. the employees).

Bottom line:  To win on the questions the court asks, employees will need to show that they have relied upon the pension system promised them when they became members of PERS.  They will need to show that the state of California has alternatives to cutting our pensions.  And, they will need to show that the idea of cutting pensions drastically was not foreseeable at the time they joined PERS.  There is no sure way to tell how the courts will rule, but by emphasizing these themes will force the courts to recognize the value of the contract the government makes with public employees and the consequences of breaking the contract.

1 Comment

What Will You Risk to Get Truth about 9/11?

4/7/2010

0 Comments

 
The kinds of risks we are willing to take speak volumes as to what policies we favor for our society.  Consider the following questions, all of which are predicated on the assumption that public policy will never perfectly address the problem that it covers.

Which possibility do you prefer?

1.  Too many people receiving government (taxpayer) services OR too few receiving them?

2.  A guilty person going free OR an innocent person punished?

3.  A fetus aborted OR a child born into a life of starvation?

4.  Children with access to marijuana OR adults deprived of marijuana for medical purposes?

5.  Nazis with free speech rights OR government censorship of movies?


Why are these questions difficult to answer?  It is because policies are designed for the masses rather than the individual.  In the first question, we cannot guarantee that everyone who needs services will receive them because of fraud and error.  If we crack down on fraud by hiring more investigators, for example, we increase the chance that those who need services will be judged in error, thus resulting in too few getting the services.

The same risk takes place in the other questions as well.  Mathematicians call this a Type I or Type II Error system.  Guilty people will go free because prosecutors, judges and jurors make mistakes or have bias that causes misconduct.  The best way to remedy the problem would be to change the laws to prevent errors from causing mistrials or by changing judicial instructions.  But the result would most likely be an increase in innocent people found guilty.

Likewise, by changing policy to discourage or forbid abortion, we risk more children born to parents who live in poverty.  If we crack down on possessionof marijuana, we risk arresting or jailing even those who use it for medical purposes.  If we tell the Nazis they may not have a parade, we will have trouble justifying a policy based on free speech for some and not others.


How do we make our decisions with these kinds of choices?

We can acknowledge that no valid opinion will please everyone.  We must at some point decide that some results are simply better than others.  Those who favor too many people receiving taxpayer expenses will undoubtedly risk others calling them names like "socialist" but the disdain of others must be risked to effect public policy.

We can apply this "Risk Model" to the most serious questions before us.  For example, we can decide whether the public needs a new investigation of the events of 9/11.  The factors include the costs to the taxpayers, time spent in Congress or whatever forum is used and the possibility of government secrets revealed.

The question before us is then: Would you prefer the possibility that guilty people go free for the crimes of 9/11 OR the possibility that taxpayer money will be wasted in the process of conducting the investigation?

It all depends on what you are willing to risk.
0 Comments

    Author

    Dean Hartwell keeps pursuing the truth about those who govern us.

    Categories

    All
    9/11
    9/11
    9/11 Flights
    9/11 Flights
    9/11 Flights
    9/11 Lies
    9/11 Lies
    9/11 Myth
    9/11 Passengers
    9/11 Passengers
    9/11 Passengers
    9/11 Passengers
    9/11 Phone
    9/11 Planes
    9/11 Planes
    9/11 Planes
    9/11 Plot
    9/11 Relatives
    9/11 Truth
    9/11 Truth
    9/11 Truth
    Acars
    Addiction
    Adventist
    Adversity
    A Fans Folklore5e0914a21d
    Afp
    Agent
    Agents
    Allies
    Amazon
    American 11
    American 77
    American 77
    American Free Press
    Amnesty
    Argument
    Armed Forces
    Assassination
    Associated Press
    Atheism
    Author
    Authority
    Authors
    Barbara Olson
    Barnes And Noble
    Baseball
    Battle
    Belief
    Bible
    Bill Giltner
    Bin Laden
    Bin Laden Framed
    Bipolar
    Bipolar Disorder
    Birthers
    Blogtalkradio
    Bob Fox
    Book
    Book Review
    Books
    Broncos
    Budget
    Bullies
    Bully
    Bureaucracy
    Burley
    Bush Administration
    Calpers
    Campaign
    Campaign 2016
    Candor
    Cell Phone Calls
    Change
    Charles Giuliani
    Cheating
    Cheney
    Choice
    Christianity
    Chuck Ochelli
    Cia
    Cimino
    Circle
    City Of San Bernardino
    Cleveland
    Colin Powell
    Comments
    Communication
    Conflict
    Conformity
    Conspiracy
    Constitution
    Constructiveness
    Contract
    Conversation
    Corporations
    Country
    Court
    Critical Acclaim
    Critical Thinking
    D
    Danne Burleyb5f49f8b7f
    Danne Burley Show3cf92a4960
    David Cay Johnston
    Dead Men Talking
    Dean Hartwell
    Debate
    Decisions
    Deficit
    Democrats
    Deportation
    Depression
    Detectors
    Dialogue
    Dick Cheney
    Discussion
    Dishonesty
    Disnformation
    Distortion
    Dont Ask Dont Tell
    Drugs
    Economy
    Election 2000
    Empowerment
    Enemies
    Error
    Euphemism
    Evidence
    Facts
    Facts Talk
    Fair Elections
    Faith
    Fakery
    Fantasy Football
    Fate
    Fear
    Fetzer
    Flight 11
    Flight 175
    Flight 77
    Flight 93
    Flights
    Football
    Footnotes
    Foreign Policy
    Free Agency
    Freedom
    Free Will
    Fuqua
    Future
    Game
    Gatekeepers
    Gay Rights
    Gays
    Gingrich
    God
    Gop
    Government
    Government Lies
    Government Responsiveness
    Grand Chessboard
    Guardian
    Gumshoe News
    Gun Control
    Gun Rights
    Happiness
    Hartwell
    Hijackers
    History
    Hoax
    Homophobia
    Hope
    Hypocrisy
    Identity
    Idolotry
    Illegal Immigration
    Immaculate Reception
    Immigration
    Infiltration
    Inlaws4243aba70b
    Innocence
    Integrity
    Intel Hub
    Intelligence
    Internet
    Interview
    Interviews
    Intuition
    Irancontra8ce74f07fb
    Isolation
    Issues
    Jack Tatum
    Jesus
    Jfk
    Jfk Assassination
    Jim Fetzer
    Jim Mason
    Jim Viken
    Joe Paterno
    John Anderson
    John B Anderson4f095ea31b
    John Madden
    July 15
    Juror
    Jury
    Jury Duty
    Justice
    Kennedy
    Kennedys
    Ken Stabler
    Killtown
    Kindle
    Kohan V Nbc
    Law
    Lawsuit
    Leaders
    Leadership
    Lee Harvey Oswald
    Lee Oswald
    Lessons
    Liaison
    Lies
    Life
    Lisa Jefferson
    Logic
    Loyalty
    Lying
    Malaysian Flight
    Manipulators
    Mary W Maxwell
    Mayor White
    Mcgreal
    Media
    Memoirs
    Mental Illness
    Mh370
    Military
    Mirsch
    Mistakes
    Modern Life
    Morality
    Movie
    Myth
    Mythology
    Nation
    Nationalism
    Nbc
    Needs
    New Media
    Newt Gingrich
    Nfl
    Nixon
    No Hijackers
    No Hijackings
    No Holding Back
    No Plane
    No Planers
    No Planes
    Oakland Raiders
    Obama
    Observations
    Occupy Wall Street
    Ochelli
    October Surprise
    Official Theories
    Olson
    Oped News
    Osama
    Osama Bin Laden
    Oswald
    Parole
    Passengers
    Paterno
    Patriotism
    Peace
    Penn State
    Pension
    Pentagon
    People
    Permanent War
    Perpetual War
    Pers
    Personal
    Persuasion
    Petition
    Philosophy
    Pictures
    Pilots For 911 Truth5753843a5f
    Planers
    Planes
    Planes Without Passengers
    Planes-without-passengers
    Planted Evidence
    Pledge Of Allegiance
    Podcast
    Policy
    Politicians
    Politics
    Power
    Praise
    Presidents
    Public
    Public Policy
    Question
    Questions
    Radio
    Raiders
    Ramona Rees
    Reagan
    Real Deal
    Reason
    Recommend
    Records
    Relatives
    Religion
    Republican Party
    Republicans
    Researchers
    Responsibility
    Resurrection
    Review
    Reviews
    Revolution
    Rfk
    Righteousness
    Rights
    Risk
    Robert Kennedy
    Romney
    Ronald Reagan
    Rules
    Rumors Fly
    Samesex Marriage05ed85f18c
    San Bernardino
    Satire
    Scams
    Scapegoats
    Script
    Secrecy
    Secret
    Self Help
    Selfhelp1a7d6cf1cb
    Selfhelp930f0ee660
    Shanksville
    Shepard
    Show
    Sirhan
    Sites
    Solutions
    Stabler
    Story
    St Peter64b59c8f07
    St Peters Choicef4a5414f38
    Strategy
    Summers
    Super Bowl
    Super Bowl Xiv
    Swan
    Taxes
    Team Sports
    Tea Party
    Technology
    Ted Olson
    Terrorism
    The Detectors
    The Detectors Featuring Dean Hartwell
    The Ochelli Effect
    Theories
    Thurman Munson
    Time Management
    Todd Beamer
    Tolerance
    Trump
    Trust
    Truth
    Type I
    Type Ii
    United
    United 175
    United-175
    United 93
    United-93
    Values
    Vancouver Hearings
    Video Fakery
    Voice
    Voters
    Wants
    War
    War On Terror
    War Party
    Was 9/11 A Movie?
    Watergate
    Will And Grace Case
    World Series
    Wrong
    Youtube
    You Tube

    Archives

    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    December 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    April 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    April 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.