Category:

Wake Me When It's Over - Lies We Will Once Again Hear This September 11

8/29/2014

We are about to go through another onslaught of misinformation by much of the media. Here is what we are bound to hear about:

The brave passengers on Flight 93
Four hijackings
Nineteen members of Al-Qaeda
Planes hitting the towers
Crazy conspiracy theories debunked

Here is the truth:

Flight 93 (aka United 93) on September 11 flew toward the West Coast long after its alleged "crash". There have never been any passengers verified for this flight, let alone anyone fighting hijackers.
There were no hijackings on September 11. Two of the flights alleged to have been hijacked NEVER EVEN TOOK OFF!
As there were no hijackings, there were no hijackings, let alone hijackings by Al-Qaeda.
No passenger planes hit anything that day.
People like me feel "crazy" listening to lies told by the media.

Source: Planes without Passengers (2nd edition) and Rumors Fly, Truth Walks, both by Dean T. Hartwell

0 Comments

Three Vancouver Hearings Speakers Blitz the Official 9/11 Theory!

3/17/2012

1 Comment

Jim Fetzer, Dennis Cimino and Dean Hartwell, all of whom will speak at the upcoming Vancouver Hearings in June, have written three articles on Veterans Today that demolish the official 9/11 theory.

Read the articles here:

9/11: Planes/No Planes and "Video Fakery" by Fetzer makes the case against the use of passenger planes as weapons on 9/11 as clear as I have ever seen. It also shows how fakery was used to deceive a gullible public.
9/11: The Official Account of the Pentagon Attack is a Fantasy by Cimino and Fetzer tells us the true story of what happened at the Pentagon by knocking out the official story.
The 9/11 Passenger Paradox: What Happened to Flight 93? by Hartwell and Fetzer answers that perplexing question with the use of circumstantial evidence and logic.

Forget about the official theory. It has been "sacked" by this blitz of essays and the ball is loose! Come to the Vancouver Hearings and watch the whole team score a touchdown!

1 Comment

Keep Asking the Right Questions - Who Were the United 93 Passengers?

1/29/2012

0 Comments

From a previous essay, “Did the United 93 Passengers Survive the Flight?” I have proven that these passengers did, in fact, do just that. This answer leads to new questions, much like fitting a piece into a jigsaw puzzle leads to the possibility that other pieces will fit as well.

If the plane landed safely, was there really a hijacking?

If there was a hijacking, it could not have been at all as the official theory tells us. The official theory tells us of hijackers who took over the plane and flew it into the ground in Shanksville, Pennsylvania.

The facts, as noted in “Did the United 93 Passengers Survive the Flight?”, tell us that the plane flew west and was identified as being in Indiana minutes after the time of the alleged crash.

Why would hijackers (especially those with a political cause) quietly fly a plane full of passengers and land it somewhere?

Why would hijackers allow phone calls to be made in the first place? The calls could have allowed relatives to inform the authorities with key details such as the location of the flight.

It seems quite safe to say that no hijackings took place.

If there were no hijackings, what were the cell/air phone calls all about?

Much has been said, and rightfully so, about the difficulty of making cell phone calls from the altitudes that commercial planes like United 93 typically fly. But even if one stipulated that all of the alleged calls were made, the substance of the calls are at odds with a plane that lands:

The Telegraph reported the following about the calls:

          In five calls, passengers and crew members said they intended to revolt.

            Jeremy Glick told his wife they had voted to tackle the terrorists to try to regain             control on the plane.

            At 9.57am, several ended calls, saying the revolt was beginning. "Everyone's                 running up to first class. I've got to go. Bye," said one.

Can we identify the passengers?

Consider how the “relatives” of the passengers responded, or rather, did not respond. One would think that they would have gone to San Francisco airport to greet or to mourn the deaths of the passengers, as is customary. However, then-Mayor Willie Brown was on his way to visit the relatives at the airport when he got word that none of them showed up.

Did these passengers use their real identities and call their relatives or did they use fake identities?

Do the relatives know more than they have let on?

0 Comments

Pictures from "Facts Talk but the Guilty Walk" for Kindle Customers

8/12/2011

0 Comments

The Kindle version of this book does not contain any pictures. Here are pictures taken from the print version:

Witnesses saw Flight 11 passengers at 7:30 AM at Gate 26 (middle star) according to Der Spiegel. But no reliable records show a takeoff there at that time on September 11, 2001.

Official theory says that Flight 11 pushed off at 7:45 AM from Gate 32 (top star).

Did these passengers go to Gate 19 (bottom star) for a 7:58 takeoff?

These are official flight paths of Flights 11 and 175.

The only direct sighting made of Flight 11 on September 11, 2001 was by the pilot of Flight 175.

Why was the only plane to "spot" Flight 11 another plane that was said to be hijacked?
Source: eeeuser.com

Evidence suggests that there were two planes identified as Flight 93 on September 11th.

This map shows the paths of two planes - one identified as UA93 North and the other as UA93 South.

According to this theory, the North plane flew in the direction of Shanksville while the South plane landed some distance away.
Source: 911Review.org

0 Comments

Wake Me When It's Over - Lies We Will Once Again Hear This September 11

Three Vancouver Hearings Speakers Blitz the Official 9/11 Theory!

Keep Asking the Right Questions - Who Were the United 93 Passengers?

Pictures from "Facts Talk but the Guilty Walk" for Kindle Customers

Author

Categories

Archives