This is Dean T. Hartwell's final say on what happened to the alleged passengers and planes of 9/11. He also talks about the value of truth seeking to our society.
He talks about events in recent history. The JFK assassination, the Viet Nam War, Sept 11, etc. Our leaders and the media frequently lie to us about these kinds of
Lies are nothing new. Most people have been lied to most of their lives. (Santa Claus - a man in a red suit flown by reindeer delivering gifts to millions of kids on one night!). No big deal.
What this book does is to tell the reader why our leaders lie. And how they benefit from it.
This book won’t change the world. That’s OK. The world isn’t going to change because someone says someone is lying! But maybe some people will.
When truth does not come from authority, we must seek authority from truth.
We may not completely understand what our government does or why they do it at all times, but we should know one truth about it. A government fears only the revolution.
This fact should not surprise anyone. Those who run the government and those who benefit from it would lose everything they have staked in it. These are the same people empowered to put down a revolution.
Two thousand years ago, the Roman Empire feared a revolt from the Jews who believed the empire had taken over land that belonged to them and forced them to pay tribute to the Caesar. The Jews did revolt on several occasions and though the Romans put each of them down, the costs of human lives and resources
So what did the Romans do?
According to Joseph Atwill, author of Caesar’s Messiah: The Roman Conspiracy to Invent Jesus, they set aside the use of force and used a different tactic to solve this problem. Specifically, they invented a brand-new religion that convinced Jews to adopt a pacifistic attitude towards the Roman authority. Instead of promoting war and dissent, the new religion told its adherents to “turn the other cheek.” and
to “render unto Caesar what is his.”
The new religion became the official religion of the Roman Empire and spread throughout the world. Billions of people practice it now. Of course, this religion is
Followers believe the New Testament’s account of a man who claims to be a deity and who proves this claim by first dying of a crucifixion and then coming back to life. Atwill points out that all evidence of this story comes from a single source, Josephus, who wrote forty years after the events described allegedly took place.
The point of the fiction is its message of peace and uncritical acceptance of authority. It still works today in the United States.
Republicans and Democrats for the most part respect authority even when the other party holds it. Fringe groups like the Tea Party only encourage respect for authority which agrees to Tea Party principles. All of these political groups are prepared to ignore the truth about authority (i.e. the legitimacy of a government) because they are too concerned about being obedient.
When the public hears names like “Lee Harvey Oswald” or “Bin Laden” broadcast (by an obedient media) as criminals, most obey the order to believe what they hear. This docility works to help our government promote official stories which are used as justification to start wars in our name.
These lies should not cause us to become pacifists. These lies should cause us to look for truth from different sources than government or religious sources. Are you willing to take that leap of logic?
In a previous article
, I speculated what may have happened to an alleged passenger of American Flight 11 on the day of September 11, 2001. Now I have
identified all of the passengers and crew on American 11 and United 175 whose names were found on the SSDI (Social Security Death Index) for American 11 and I paint a more complete picture of my
Thank you to the Web Fairy and Vince Sammartino for their hard work on this subject.
CREWSara Low, 28 27 Oct 1972 -- 11 Sep 2001 Madeline Sweeney, 35 MADELINE A SWEENEY17 Dec 1916 -- 09 Dec
2001 (MARY F SWEENEY 01 Jan 1929-11 Sep
PASSENGERS Jeffrey Coombs, 42 18 Sep 1958 -- 11 Sep
2001 Tara Creamer, 30 30 Nov 1970 -- 11
Sep Thelma Cuccinello, 71 THELMA R CUCCINELLO 01 Feb 1930 -- 11 Sep
2001 Brian Dale, 43 BRIAN P DALE 23 Oct 1957 -- 11 Sep
2001 Alex Filipov, 70 ALEXANDER M FILIPOV 11 Apr 1931 -- 11 Sep
2001 Carol Flyzik, 40 CAROL A FLYZIK 13 Mar 1961 -- 11 Sep
2001 Paul Friedman, 45 PAUL J FRIEDMAN 13 Aug 1956 -- 11 Sep
2001 Karleton D.B. Fyfe, 31 KARLETON D FYFE 10 Feb 1970 -- 11 Sep
2001 Linda George, 27 LINDA M GEORGE 11 Jun 1974 -- 11 Sep
2001 Peter Hashem, 40, PETER P HASHEM 20 Mar 1961 -- 11 Sep
2001 Robert Hayes, 37 ROBERT E HAYES 09 Sep 1930 -- 11 Sep
2001 Ted Hennessy, 35 EDWARD R HENNESSY 01 Mar 1966 -- 11 Sep
2001 Barbara Keating, 72 BARBARA A KEATING 23 Dec 1928 -- 11 Sep 2001
(PAUL H KEATING 04 Sep 1963 -- 11 Sep
2001) Carlos Montoya CARLOS M MONTOYA 01 Mar 1965 -- 11 Sep
2001 Laura Lee Morabito, 34 LAURA L MORABITO 04 Oct 1966 -- 11 Sep
2001 Mildred Naiman MILDRED NAIMAN 24 Mar 1920 -- 11 Sep
2001 Laurie Neira LAURIE NEIRA 08 Dec 1952 -- 11 Sep
2001 Robert Norton, 82 ROBERT G NORTON 11 May 1916 -- 11 Sep
2001 Thomas Pecorelli, 31 THOMAS PECORELLI 08 Oct 1970 -- 11 Sep
2001 Richard Ross, 58 RICHARD ROSS 29 Apr 1943 -- 11 Sep
2001 James Trentini, 65 JAMES A TRENTINI 24 May 1936 -- 11 Sep
2001 Mary Trentini, 67 MARY B TRENTINI 11 Feb 1934 -- 11 Sep
2001 Mary Wahlstrom, 75, MARY A WAHLSTROM 19 Apr 1923 -- 11 Sep
Waldie, 46 KENNETH E WALDIE 13 May 1955 -- 11 Sep 2001
Sources: http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/AA11.victims.html http://thewebfairy.com/911/boeing/ssdi-11.htm
I will assume for the sake of argument that these 25 were real people whose families reported their deaths to the proper authorities on or around September 11, 2011. The others will be assumed to be fake identities or the identities of people who really died prior to that day.
Now we have 25 people who may well have gone to Boston Logan Airport on September 11. As was
mentioned in the previous article, Flight 11 never took off and was not even scheduled.
Let’s place the 25 at Logan Airport and assume they (a) get word at the airport that Flight 11 is not available and that they should exchange their tickets for American 11 for United 175 or (b) they know all along to go to United 175.
Either way, they get to Gate 19, the gate for United 175. Their presence does not likely cause
any attention because they probably appear to anyone watching as passengers arriving for the flight they wanted. They then board the plane.
Their takeoff is approximately 8:23 AM (some sources say 8:14 AM, but evidence suggests a similar plane took off at that time, perhaps as a decoy for United 175).
Who else was on this plane?
Various media sources have indicated that 65 people, including crew, were on United 175.
In terms of the SSDI, what do we know about these alleged crew and passengers?
CREW Capt. Victor Saracini, Lower Makefield Twp., PA. YES. ssn
148-40-1155. Michael Horrocks, First Officer. YES.
200-56-3596. Amy N. Jarret, N. Smithfield, RI, flight attendant. YES.
Summary for crew: 9 persons overall, 3 listed in SSDI, 6 not
PASSENGERS Mark Bavis, 31, West Newton, MA YES.
014-66-0115. Lynn Goodchild, 25, Attleboro, MA. YES. 5/27/1976;
028-64-1219. Rev. Francis E. Grogan, 76, Easton, MA. YES. (SSDI suggests last
residence as Bridgeport, CT). Carl Hammond, 37, Boston, MA. YES. 10/4/63. SSN
419-78-1048. Gerald Hardacre. YES. 11/21/1939;
564-56-5300. James E. Hayden, 47, Westford, MA, CFO of Netegrity, Inc. YES.
3/29/1954; 039-36-7272. Herbert Homer, 48, Milford, MA, worked for Raytheon (major
employer in Mass., also a huge military contractor). YES. 2/5/1953;
013-42-8804. Robert LeBlanc, Lee, NH, professor emeritus at U. of NH,
specialist in Canadian studies and Franco-American communities in New England.
YES. 10/28/1930; 002-20-8599 Maclovo "Joe" Lopez, Jr., 41, Norwalk, CA. YES. 4/29/1960;
555-11-6604. Patrick Quigley, 40, Wellesley, MA. Partner at PriceWaterhouse
Cooper. YES. 2/25/1961; 159-44-2169. Kathleen Shearer, Dover, NH YES 3/11/1940;
546-56-0507 Robert Shearer, (CNN says Dover, NH, SSDI says Portsmouth, NH)
YES 3/1/1938; 531-34-6781. Presumably Kathleen Shearer's
husband. Brian Sweeney, 38, Barnstable, MA. YES.
By this count, there are 13 YES, 30 NO and 4 FOREIGN entries of the names shown by CNN for the passengers.
Combined with the 25 “passengers” from Flight 11, we now have 38 people noted in the SSDI as having died on September 11, 2001. I will ignore the number of foreigners and the crew members in this essay as the number 38 is arbitrary.
What we do not know is how many people were actually on United 175, although we do receive a hint of this number later.
The flight allegedly crashes into World Trade Center south tower at 9:03 AM.
ACARS shows the flight to have been flying over Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania at 9:23 AM. It lands in Cleveland at approximately 10:45 AM.
Newspapers report approximately 200 passengers walking from the area where the flight landed toward the NASA building at Cleveland Hopkins Airport not long afterward. But there is no source for this number.
Did the 38 passengers later recorded on the SSDI walk among the group seen?
Probably. They had nowhere else to go. The airport had already been evacuated.
Were there really 200 people on this walk?
Let’s assume there were. That would mean the non-passengers outnumbered the passengers by about a four-to-one ratio. Perhaps the plotters used four agents for every passenger to make sure the passengers went to the NASA building without tipping off their identities.
This group of people went inside the NASA building. No one has reported where, if anywhere, they went after that point.
The next we hear of the 38 is that they are among those listed as having died on either American 11 or United 175. Friends and relatives learn this news on September 12. On September 13, the Boston Globe
publishes a list of American 11 passengers without saying anything about the source.
The 38 were last seen around noon in Cleveland on the 11th. This gives whoever wrote the list that the public would rely upon a whole day to get the names in order for their presentation (the fact that different lists have emerged and that the authenticity of the manifests was STIPULATED to in court but never PROVEN enhances the idea that someone made them up).
Why wouldn’t this “list maker” for the American 11 and United 175 flights be present in the NASA building?
This person could confirm which names were to be used by seeing the passengers and any agents first-hand. There they could make mistakes in spelling because they did not hear something right. They could watch who left.
Better yet, they could control when people would leave.
Word by now was getting out in the news that American 11 and United 175 had crashed into the towers at the World Trade Center. This lie sank into the public’s perception of this event fairly
So the list maker had to make sure that the 38 would forever be associated with the crash site in New York and not associated in any way with Cleveland. And this is the best reason why these 38 were not executed.
Killing people leaves evidence. Their executions would have had to have taken place in Cleveland (no one could fly for a week and transporting them would carry with it the passenger perception of duress, not to mention more opportunities for the public to notice them).
If any evidence of their deaths were found to have happened in Cleveland, the proverbial ballgame would be over. The die had already been cast that they had died in New York!
So, upon the news reaching relatives and later the media that they had “died,” the passengers were allowed to leave the NASA building one by one. Monitored. Watched. Listened to. One person contacting the public could be written off by the plotters as a “no show.”
Once the last passenger left and followed their directions as to their new life, the Cleveland chapter was done.
Source: Planes without Passenger: the Faked Hijackings of 9/11
, 2nd edition unless
According to the official theory of the events of 9/11, all passengers of American Airlines Flight 11 crashed into the World Trade Center and died upon impact.
Twelve years of research have produced a number of facts to contradict this assertion. Among them are these two courtesy of the original Bureau of Transportation records before they were altered:
American Airlines Flight 11 was never scheduled.
American Airlines Flight 11 never took off.
From these two facts, we can make a necessary inference that no one boarded Flight 11 and took off in it.
We can also infer that people said to have been passengers on Flight 11 were either (a) real people who went somewhere else or (b) were not real people.
Recently, I received an email from a man who claimed he knew a specific person said to be a passenger on Flight 11. He alluded to a source who claimed that he overheard the passenger, whom I will call “11X”, calling a taxi on the morning of September 11, 2001 and then saw board with luggage a taxi shortly thereafter. He claims neither he nor anyone else who knew him has seen 11X again.
In this essay, I will assume the good faith of the claims of the man who emailed me. Let’s say that 11X was in fact a real person who indicated to others he would take a flight from Boston to Los Angeles on that morning and that 11X’s name ended up on a passenger list (whether it was an unofficial list or the manifest is not at issue here).
How does this stipulation fit in with the facts established about the flight?
11X shows up at Boston Logan Airport. He goes to one of the two gates alleged for Flight 11’s departure, Gate 26 or Gate 32. He boards the plane he believes is Flight 11.
What happened there is subject to debate. A writer on the “Let’s Roll Forums” came up with what I believe is the best explanation. Here is the link. My summary follows:
The writer, who goes by the nickname “LoopDLoop,” asserts that the plane was used as a simulation, which would explain phone calls made by flight attendants about hijackings on a flight that never flew. Loop cites an early interview of airport personnel who saw the plane for Flight 11 on the ground quite some time after its alleged 7:59 AM take off.
As for the “passengers,” Loop does not know for sure what became of them but suggests that no one remained on board, but rather, that the people needed for the simulation took the airplane phone with them to another location to conduct the simulation.
What was next for 11X?
He could have left the airport at this point, but as we know he did not return home again, this scenario seems unlikely. It would leave him without any purpose.
If he intended to go to Los Angeles, he would have looked for another flight out there. If he expected that Flight 11 would not take off, he would have likely arrived at the airport ready to go to his next place.
In either case, the most likely possibility would have put him at Gate 19 for United Airlines Flight 175.
As I have pointed out in books on this subject, he had time to get from either Gate 32 or Gate 26 to go to Gate 19. I have suggested he (and other passengers) could have been “taxied” to Gate 19. Some say that such a plane would have been noticed. Maybe so. If it were noticed, there is no telling if anyone reporting it would have been believed. Furthermore, the plane would have gone around a corner, possibly losing the interest of onlookers. With a little effort, passengers could make the distance on foot, anyway.
In any case, 11x now boards United 175.
If he had an American Flight 11 ticket, he could have quickly gone to the United Airlines booth and exchanged tickets for the 175 flight. And who is to say what ticket 11x held? With no direct information on this matter, it is possible he was instructed to go to United 175 all along.
United 175 takes off (late, according to some sources). Thanks to ACARS, we know that this flight was over Western Pennsylvania TEN MINUTES after its supposed crash into World Trade Center Two. We also know that an unidentified plane (by flight number) landed in Cleveland some time later, matching the description of the plane for United 175.
This places 11X at the Cleveland Hopkins Airport.
Newspaper articles cite a large group of passengers walking from the area where the unidentified plane landed toward a building managed by NASA. This walk takes place long after the airport has been evacuated!
11X goes into the NASA building.
There are no facts available after this point. His execution or his decision to hide both explain his absence. Those who insist he was murdered could point to his character or his ties to the community but neither prove the point. If he went hiding (as an agent, for example), there may be circumstantial evidence of participation in a plan but not enough evidence to prove that point.
Those who plotted this crime are probably laughing that we cannot untangle the mess they left for us. It is my hope that presenting this essay will spark an idea or uncover a fact to get past this paradox.
Source (unless otherwise identified): Planes without Passengers: the Faked Hijackings of 9/11, 2nd edition by Dean T. Hartwell
A recent reviewer
of my book Planes without Passengers: the Faked Hijackings of 9/11
(2nd edition) wrote that the book needs a third edition. He is right. I write this “edition” to distill the message of the first two editions to just one sentence:
THERE WERE NO HIJACKINGS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001.
In short, the stories of plane hijackings and the use of the planes by hijackers to strike buildings was a complete hoax. So, too, were stories of distressed passenger calls from planes. The more I researched and debated this matter, furthermore, the more it appeared that, with some exceptions, the alleged passengers were manufactured or used identities.
Background information on the web are these two essays, the first co-written with Jim Fetzer:
“The 9/11 Passenger Paradox: What Happened to Flight 93?”http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/03/15/the-911-passenger-paradox-what-happened-to-flight-93/
“The 9/11 Passenger Paradox: What Happened to Flights 175, 77 and 11?”http://deanhartwell.weebly.com/1/post/2012/03/the-911-passenger-paradox-what-happened-to-flights-175-77-and-11.html
Can anyone disprove my hypothesis?
In a recent essay, I named a number of "trees" in the forest of lies given to us by our leaders and our mainstream media:JFK, RFK, October Surprise, Bush v. Gore, Nine Eleven, etc.How do you suppose we get out of this forest?Elections? But leaders in both parties have lied to us and covered up crimes.Alternative Media? I like alternative forms of media but how long must we wait until a critical mass disregards the mainstream media's conclusions on the "trees"? And who is to say that alternatives won't be part of the controlled opposition?Rounding up the criminals behind these events? Good luck with that. Since when has anyone gone to jail for anything I have mentioned.The only real way to clear out the corruption is the unthinkable. We will simply have to think of a way around that.
JFK, MLK, RFK
Gulf of Tonkin
Vietnam, Desert Storm
The October Surprise, Iran-Contra
Bush vs. Gore
What do all of these and other events have in common?
War mongers profited and chances for peace plummeted
The official story given to the public through the corporate media
Once again trumped the truth
It will keep on happening
Because we think we are free
And we are
Except we have no freedom to change the direction of our nation
Many people laugh when I suggest that people connected to the government lied to the public about the events of 9/11.
But when I say politicians lie, or members of the Supreme Court lie, or that public officials lie about other matters, the same people nod their heads and agree enthusiastically.
Why is that?
It has to do with needs. If one determines that they need something, they tend to hold on to it more tightly than something they could do without. This attitude is simple human nature.
According to Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs (see picture), a person’s first set of needs are the most basic: we all need to breathe, drink water, eat food, etc. If we are dependent (or believe we are dependent) upon someone else to provide these necessities, we would not likely question that person or antagonize them. We could be saying goodbye to our lives!
Once a person achieves this first set of needs, this theory tells us, they are able to handle the next set, which is about the security of: one’s person, employment, health, etc. If one does not feel secure about themselves and about their position in society, they will not be able to move up the “ladder” of the hierarchy and make friends or feel self-confidence.
“Rocking the boat” and questioning those who provide security, such as agents of our government, jeopardizes one’s ability to become a confident and social person. It may not be the same as being deprived of water, but one who openly doubts those charged with providing security risks social suicide!
No wonder a majority of people still trust our government with the responsibility of protecting us from attack, despite overwhelming evidence that the events of 9/11 were a hoax! It is far safer to “settle” for accusing politicians of lying and cheating because there is no fear of retaliation or alienation for espousing these views.
Yes, we all understand the advantage of safety: one does not have to lift a finger.
Imagine the possibility of afterlife. This idea goes beyond one’s security on the temporary home of Planet Earth. It goes to eternal life.
Imagine a deity who records your every thought and action. Imagine your destination after life going favorably in one direction and horribly in another direction. Imagine this deity having control over which way you go.
Many of those who are willing to speak out against the actions of those charged with running our government are unwilling to speak up about certain religions that threaten eternal insecurity to those that question the deity.
There is something missing in the Maslow’s theory. Somewhere after we get our water and our food, we need to grasp the right to ask questions and to obtain answers. The idea of either trusting our leaders blindly to protect us or to face alienation is not sufficient for any of us to function in a world of deception and lies.
That’s my theory. We need choices that reflect our needs, not our fears.
The events of 9/11 were a hoax. I spent several years researching the event and have presented my conclusions on this topic. People are free to read what I have to say and agree or disagree with those conclusions.
My question now is: what should we who are convinced of the falsity of the official theory of 9/11 want?
We will never convict those responsible for this fraud.
We will never get the mainstream media to show our side to the story.
We will never reverse the policies that came about as a result of the fraud.
With that in mind, we can and should focus on something that we can attain. It is something far more basic than any of these other goals and perhaps even more useful.
It is the simple concept of freedom.
The controversy over what happened on September 11 and many other events before and since has stoked the fears of all of us.
Fear of terrorists. Fear of foreigners. Fear of flying. Fear of freedoms being taken from us. Fear of the future.
In the words of Franklin Roosevelt, we need freedom from fear.
We can work toward this goal by untangling us from what makes us so afraid: the unknown. Answers to a few simple questions would be helpful.
Are you afraid the government will take your guns (or other freedoms)?
Do you often believe what the same government tells you about 9/11 and other events?
Do you believe history repeats itself?
Do you believe the future will be much different than the past?
If you are willing to hold two contradictory thoughts at the same time, will you ever achieve freedom of thought?
Welcome to a future that will be a lot like what we have already experienced. The government and media will continue to lie to protect interests. People will continue to predict Doomsday. The truth about anything important will be known but never stated openly until it no longer matters.
Clear your mind and follow the way of the world. Not a straight line to disaster but one big familiar circle instead.
Conspiracy theory is dead.
That’s because it never existed.
Whether things (allegedly) happen, it hardly matters that the action was planned; it matters a lot more as to WHO planned them and WHO carried them out.
Take the competing theories as to what happened on September 11, 2001.
The official theory says that nineteen hijackers and others planned attacks.
Alternate theories say that others planned the attacks.
Still other theories contend that the events were staged with the goal to frame people for committing attacks.
All of these theories could be characterized as conspiracy theories.
So why bother using this phrase?
It is awfully strange that those who disagree with the official theory are the ones given the label of conspiracy theorists.
The one word missing in the shallow analysis often offered about the events is the word “agent.”
According to Dictionary.com, an agent is one who is a person or business authorized to act on another's behalf
We learned through a Fox News headline today that there was “9/11 plane landing gear found in Lower Manhattan.” Getting to the text, the message softens a bit, to “Part of landing gear apparently from one of the jetliners that crashed into the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, has been found wedged between two buildings.”
Apparently. The article never tells us which plane the landing gear came from, although it quotes the deputy police commissioner of New York City as saying that the gear has a Boeing number identification clearly identified upon it.
What does this have to do with the concept of conspiracy?
We have been persuaded to believe, from this article, and numerous media reports before it, that the only true theory is the official one. The wording “from one of the jetliners that crashed…” gives away this presumption.
We have been persuaded to believe that only conspiracy theorists believe otherwise. By implication, we are to ignore their ideas completely.
We are persuaded to ignore the possibility of agency, in this case the idea that people not privy to the plan could act on behalf of those who made the plan.
With that, the news media which rehashes this “news” will completely ignore what many alternative theorists have said for years: that of the four planes alleged to have been a part of the events of September 11, two of them did not fly and two of them flew well past the time of the alleged attacks on the World Trade Center buildings.
You can believe those who condemn conspiracy theory while secretly supporting one.
Or you can believe those who are willing to present an alternative to a theory that does not work.