|
Link to the show: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/danneburleyshow/2011/09/02/the-detectors-hosted-by-danne-burleyweeblylink_new_window
Links referred to during show: Fetzer's Seven Questions about 9/11 and Killtown's: Did Flight 77 really crash into the Pentagon
1 Comment
Dean Hartwell's new book, Facts Talk but the Guilty Walk: the 9/11 No Hijacker Theory and Its Indictment of Our Leaders, is now on Amazon! Here is a description of it:
Dean T. Hartwell puts into regular-sized font all of his work on the subject of 9/11. Part One is "Indictment of Conspiracy," a chapter of his book "Dead Men Talking: Consequences of Government Lies." Hartwell identifies many of the perpetrators of the crimes of 9/11 and states what they did and with whom they did it. Part Two is the entire book "Planes without Passengers: the Faked Hijackings of 9/11." Hartwell gives a compelling hypothesis, backed by fact and circumstantial evidence, that the plotters used planes and passengers as props to simulate hijackings and to misdirect the investigation. Part Three is a set of essays on the topic of 9/11 going back to 2005. Among them is "If a Good Man Would Have Talked: the Grand Jury Testimony of Colin Powell," a fictional hearing in which the reader learns the group of people behind the whole crimes. Another essay, "Osama bin Laden Had Nothing to Do with 9/11" is a timely and well-reasoned argument that the United States used bin Laden, first as a partner in fighting the old Soviet Union in Afghanistan, and then as a scapegoat for the events of 9/11. The case that bin Laden actually died shortly after 2001 may come as a surprise to those who think he was killed May 1, 2011! Readers can also get a sense not only of what really happened on September 11, 2001 but how the event was planned. A good essay for this concept is "How the Plotters Scripted 9/11" The brand-new Afterword tells how we, the public, become so easily misled by what our leaders and by what the media explain to us about events like 9/11. Hartwell demonstrates that this tragedy was planned well in advance and had as its foreshadowing events that took place in Iran and other parts of the Middle East over thirty years ago! Here is a sample of the Afterword: "The assumption of Flight 11 led to the assumption of a hijacking, in which terrorists flew this plane (and others) into targets to kill passengers and destroy property. The assumptions right from the beginning conveniently absolved anyone on the inside (government officials and agents) from any wrongdoing. And, after hearing repeatedly in the media about the flights with their numbers and details about alleged passengers, few people were willing to question any of it. There never was a commercial American Flight 11 on that day. Instead, as I point out in Part Two, Planes without Passengers: the Faked Hijackings of 9/11, a passengerless flight took off from Boston that morning and became identified as Flight 11 on the screens. The real Flight 11 was grounded, hidden in some hanger and available for use for fake airphone calls. The same script was used for the other three planes to complete what became the official version of events. The gist of the story is simple: bin Laden’s people hijacked the planes, all of the passengers are dead and no one in our government knew about it ahead of time or had anything to do with it..." I was on the Monday, March 21st broadcast to discuss the alleged passengers of 9/11. Click here to listen to the show (I come on at the 1:08 mark)
Planes without Passengers Timeline of 9/11 Events Appendix B – Timeline Codes for Sources: HC = historycommons.org BTS = Bureau of Transportation Statistics R=9/11 Official Report DS=Der Spiegel magazine; BG=Boston Globe USA=USA Today CM=Local Cleveland media All times Eastern time zone 7:30 A.M. – Passengers seen waiting in line in front of Gate 26 at Boston (DS) 7:40 A.M. – 11 “pushes back” from Gate 26 in Boston (BG) 7:45 A.M. – 11 “wheels off” from Gate 32 according to anonymous airport employee (BG) 7:58 A.M. – 175 with tail # N612UA “pushes back” from Gate in Boston (BTS) 7:59 A.M. – 11 “wheels off” from Boston (HC, DS) 8:02 A.M. – 93 “pushes back” from Gate in Newark (HC) 8:09 A.M. – 77 “pushes back” from Gate in Dulles (R) 8:14 A.M. – 175 “wheels off” from Boston (HC) 8:20 A.M. – 77 “wheels off” from Dulles (HC) 8:23 A.M. – 175 with tail # N612UA “wheels off” from Boston (BTS) 8:25 A.M. – 1989 “wheels off” from Boston (BTS) 8:28 A.M. – 93 “wheels off” from Newark (BTS) 8:42 A.M. – 93 “wheels off” from Newark (HC) 8:42 A.M. – some sources say this is the time of 175’s first sign of deviation from flight plan 8:46 A.M. – World Trade Center 1 (north tower) struck (HC) 8:52 A.M. – Air Traffic Controllers lose contact with 175 9:03 A.M. – World Trade Center II (south tower) is struck (HC) 9:35 A.M. – 93 nears Cleveland, then turns south away from it 9:37 A.M. – Explosion at Pentagon (HC) 9:45 A.M. – FAA orders all planes to land 10:03 – 10:10 A.M. – Crash at Shanksville, PA (seven minute discrepancy) (HC) 10:10 A.M. – First plane of two mystery planes (1989) lands in Cleveland (USA) 10:45 A.M. – Second plane of two mystery planes (175) lands in Cleveland (CM)  Planes without Passengers: The Faked Hijackings of 9/11Dean Hartwell's new book, Planes without Passengers: The Faked Hijackings of 9/11, will come out in 2011. Here is his preface:
I do not know if we can ever discover the whole truth about 9/11. I simply present my work as a report that tells what most likely happened to the planes and passengers associated with the event. I have limited my scope to ascertaining what planes were used, how they were used and the role that the passengers played. One reading my work will NOT find out, for example, what hit the World Trade Center buildings or the Pentagon. These and other issues like it are best left to those with specific scientific knowledge and aptitude. I do, though, say what did not strike them. We are about to observe the tenth anniversary of this horrific event and attention given to it may never be higher for all we now know. It is simply a matter of catching that attention while I can. So now that I have your attention, here is my hope for you: I want you to take what I say seriously enough to read it all and critically enough to challenge it. What distinguishes this book from others on the topic of 9/11? The book takes risks to present its case to the reader. For instance, by suggesting that the passengers were not victims but rather people who knew something about the plot ahead of time will not make this book popular for those who find this sort of talk unsettling. I follow what I sincerely believe to be the truth knowing that the truth is not always kind because I want to know what happened to the passengers. What led me to write this book? In the ten years since the events of September 11, 2001, I have seen those events from different angles. Until 2005, I never seriously questioned the official version of nineteen Al-Qaeda hijackers and four flights of passengers smashing into landmark buildings and the ground in Shanksville, Pennsylvania. After reading books by David Ray Griffin, Michael Ruppert and others, I started to formulate questions about the Bush Administration's handling of the events. By 2006, I started to write critically of the official story, citing, among other things, the Bush Administration's failure to keep its initial promise to provide proof of Osama bin Laden's guilt. The following year, I wrote a long essay about Vice President Cheney's involvement in the crimes of 9/11. This essay, "Indictment of Conspiracy," became a chapter in a book I published in August 2009 Dead Men Talking: Consequences of Government Lies, which also criticized the official theories of the Kennedy brother murders. Readers of my previous efforts, such as Dead Men Talking and the essay Misdirection: Following the Plot, Execution and Cover-up of 9/11 Crimes, will note that I have changed my point of view on some issues. Truth seeking is usually a process of sorting through assertions and I made it a point to post my essays (the drafts of this book) on the Internet to get feedback from people with differing viewpoints, some of which began to appeal to me. Since that book's publication, I have focused upon what happened to the planes and the passengers. My key determination was the significance of Bureau of Transportation records indicating that, of the four alleged flights, only United 175 and United 93 were actually scheduled and recorded as having taken off that day. The Burden of Proof Is on Me As I have selected the topic and have chosen to indict the official theory with my accusations, I accept the burden of proof. In general, I will prove that no passengers were hijacked or killed on September 11, 2001. Specifically, as a way to prove this proposition, I will answer the following questions and more: How many planes were used in the plot? Which ones had passengers and which ones did not? What happened to passengers from these flights after they left the planes? So here I am with the best story that I have come up with yet about the issues that I believe are most important. The reader is invited to think critically and make their own conclusion. |
AuthorDean Hartwell keeps pursuing the truth about those who govern us. Categories
All
Archives
May 2020
|
RSS Feed
