Michael Thurman writes "Forget the towers, the hocus pocus that Hartwell describes around the planes could crack this affair wide open. He doesn't provide all the answers, but his analysis is spot on. He asks the right questions that no one else seems to be asking. Highly recommended." (5/21/12)
R. Rycoff states "There had NEVER BEFORE IN HISTORY been 4 simultaneous hijackings of airliners!!" (5/12/12)
Thank you to Barnes & Noble for putting Planes without Passengers: the Faked Hijackings of 9/11 on the "Current Affairs" bookshelf of my local store! This is a personal milestone!!!
Here is a list of videos who mention my book in their introductions.
My book, Planes without Passengers: the Faked Hijackings of 9/11, has now received ten reviews on Amazon. The most recent one, written by "RennMax," says that the book "gets really close to the truth." Read the review here.
Planes without Passengers: the Faked Hijackings of 9/11 advances the theory that neither flight 175 nor 93 crashed that day but were instead flying long after the times of their alleged crashes.Pilots for 9/11 Truth, an organization dedicated to uncovering what happened on 9/11, previously confirmed that United 175 received a message at least twenty minutes after it allegedly crashed into the World Trade Center. It has now proven that United 93 was flying over 500 miles away from its alleged crash site AT THE TIME IT SUPPOSEDLY CRASHED! The book
See the Pilots site here.
Pilots for 9/11 Truth, an organization dedicated to uncovering what happened on 9/11, has confirmed that United 175 received a message at least twenty minutes after it allegedly crashed into the World Trade Center. This proves that the flight never smashed into the Center but instead flew for some time that day, a point advanced in the book Planes without Passengers: the Faked Hijackings of 9/11.
The organization reveals this information on their site. They discuss a system of sending and receiving messages to and from airplanes in flight called ACARS, or Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System. They have quoted a United dispatcher named Ed Ballinger as saying that the second time stamp shown on the messages is the acknowledgement of receipt, a key point because the acknowledgement proves the flight had not crashed at the time of the last known message, 9:23 AM (the alleged crash was at 9:03 AM).
Planes without Passengers: the Faked Hijackings of 9/11 recently made it to the top of Amazon's charts for history books in large print! Here are some web sites who helped make that possible:
Dean Hartwell's concise theory as to what happened to the planes and passengers of 9/11 is now on Kindle! The book has done exceptionally well in paper back form and the author wanted to make it available in this format. Click here!
Questions and Answers about Planes without Passengers
Q: Why would the plotters decide to allow the passengers to live?
A: There may be more to this plot that has not been discovered yet. There are also many places to put people who have been presumed to have died in this manner, such as underground bunkers alleged to exist. The plotters may need them again.
Q: Why does it matter what struck the buildings?
A: If we can determine that planes other than Flights 11 and 175 hit the World Trade Center, we can easily rule out the official theory. We can also begin to identify those who had the capacity to send other aircraft. We can start to get the truth as to how passengers were used as well. It provides a necessary shift in perspective away from old thinking.
Q: Why does it matter if Flights 11 and 77 were not scheduled?
A: Common sense tells us it would be difficult for passengers to learn about a plane that has not been scheduled to fly. It should get our suspicion that anyone on the plane is probably a part of the plot. And it also implicates American Airlines as part of the plot because someone in the company had to have arranged the plane.
Q: Wouldn’t this plot involve too many people keeping secrets? Wouldn’t someone tell?
A: The first question is impossible to answer. If secrets have been kept by several people, we would not, by definition, know. But we do know that secrets have been kept for long periods of time, such as the fact that the United States started the fighting against North Viet Nam at the Gulf of Tonkin in 1964.