Three Vancouver Hearings Speakers Blitz the Official 9/11 Theory!

03/17/2012

1 Comment

 
Jim Fetzer, Dennis Cimino and Dean Hartwell, all of whom will speak at the upcoming Vancouver Hearings in June, have written three articles on Veterans Today that demolish the official 9/11 theory.

Read the articles here:

9/11: Planes/No Planes and "Video Fakery" by Fetzer makes the case against the use of passenger planes as weapons on 9/11 as clear as I have ever seen.  It also shows how fakery was used to deceive a gullible public.
9/11: The Official Account of the Pentagon Attack is a Fantasy by Cimino and Fetzer tells us the true story of what happened at the Pentagon by knocking out the official story.
The 9/11 Passenger Paradox: What Happened to Flight 93? by Hartwell and Fetzer answers that perplexing question with the use of circumstantial evidence and logic.

Forget about the official theory.  It has been "sacked" by this blitz of essays and the ball is loose!  Come to the Vancouver Hearings and watch the whole team score a touchdown!

1 Comment
 

The Argument against No Planers Won't Fly

03/12/2012

0 Comments

 
Those who oppose the official theory about 9/11 are split over whether planes were used.

The “no planers” contend that no planes hit the World Trade Center, the Pentagon or Shanksville (and some go as far as to say that no planes were used at all).  So they do not believe passengers died at the respective “crash” sites.

What is significant about the issue of whether passengers died at each site?

As part of the official theory, the assertion that people died in the crashes authorizes the government to pay out to the families.  This would be the routine payout of Social Security benefits and the special “Victim Compensation Fund.”

However, very few families have opted for the Fund.

No debris at any “crash” scene has ever been traced back to any of the planes.  Two of the flights were not scheduled and did not take off on 9/11.  The other two flights have been tracked miles away from their “crash” scenes AFTER the crashes supposedly took place!

Yet the “planers” make ad hominem attacks against those who follow the facts.

Is there any connection between the “planers” and the families of the “victims”?

Add Comment
 

Jim Fetzer's "9/11 Planes/No Planes and "Video Fakery"

02/21/2012

0 Comments

 
9/11 Planes/No Planes and "Video Fakery" in Veterans Today

One of the commenters wrote:
But what happened to all the supposed passengers that died on those planes? Where are they now? · · 9 hours ago
  • James Henry Fetzer · Top Commenter · Works at McKnight Professor Emeritus, UMD Since the flights were faked, the passengers–for the most part–were probably faked, too. But those who are willing to murder 3,000 in New York are not going to hesitate to take out a handful more to create the pathos that you describe. These questions will be addressed by Dean Hartwell, author of PLANES WITHOUT PASSENGERS, during The Vancouver Hearings, http://www911vancouverhearings.com/.

    Recall, Pilots has determined that Flights 93 and 175 WERE IN THE AIR AT THE TIMES OF THEIR PURPORTED CRASH. Presumably, they had some passengers aboard. When you think of them as disposable props, the whole scenario becomes even more chilling. They may have been offloaded and then permanently eliminated, where their bodies might even have been used as proof of those crashes.     · · about an hour ago
Add Comment
 

Seven Questions for 9/11 "Planers"

09/14/2011

0 Comments

 
"Seven Questions for 9/11 'Planers'"

Do you believe that the use of planes on September 11, 2001, specifically Flights 11, 175, 77 and 93, has been proven?  If so, please answer these questions:

1)     Are you aware of videotape footage from surveillance cameras that show any of the passengers at any of the airports in question?  (Authenticity, in the form of date and time stamping, for instance, is crucial).
2)    Are you aware of any plane parts (found at the crime scenes) that have been traced back to any of the planes said to have been used that day?
3)    Are you aware of any videotapes that show a plane striking the Pentagon? 4)    Are you sure that cell phone calls could have been made from the altitudes the planes supposedly reached on the flights?
5)    Do you believe anyone could take an air phone from the back of a plane seat to the back of the airplane, as is suggested in one of the allegations of Barbara Olson’s phone calls?
6)    Are you aware of any phone bills that show alleged passengers as having called during the times of the alleged flights?
7)    Are you aware that the original Bureau of Transportation records indicate that Flights 175 and 93 took off on September 11, 2001 but that Flight 11 and 77 did not take off and were not even scheduled for flight that day?

The lack of satisfactory answers to these and other questions keeps me on the side of the “no planers.” If there had been passenger planes that struck the buildings as stated, there would be ready answers to questions #1 - #3.  Airports keep surveillance tapes, investigators should have been able to locate plane pieces traceable to the planes and the Pentagon has had numerous cameras pointed at it around the clock!

And whether a “planer” believes that cell phones or air phones (or both) were used on the planes, there should be proof of calls available to answer #6.

As for #7, original records showing that all four flights were scheduled and took off should be available as well.
Add Comment
 

Planes without Passengers is Out Now - January 8, 2011

01/04/2011

3 Comments

 

Planes without Passengers is Out!

I wrote Dead Men Talking: Consequences of Government Lies and published it in August 2009.  Most of the book covered the events of 9/11 and I wrote what I thought to be true at the time of its publication.

But I have changed my mind about some things since then.  During most of 2010, I decided to research one facet of the story, the planes and passengers, and worked on determining what happened to them.  I gained feedback from my postings of essays on the Internet and finally put together my thoughts on these issues in my new book, Planes without Passengers: the Faked Hijackings of 9/11.

In Dead Men Talking, I stipulated to the idea that hijackers had taken over all four of the alleged planes and added my idea that the conspirators had “hijacked” the planes from the ground and steered them into the World Trade Center and Pentagon.

The new book delves deeper and goes over the official scheduling and take-off records for airplanes, the Bureau of Transportation Statistics.  I reveal that only two of the planes, United 175 and United 93 were scheduled to take off on September 11, 2001.  I began to wonder how “hijackers” and passengers could find out about unscheduled flights!

Planes without Passengers provides pieces of the puzzle of 9/11 that better fit the facts about the planes and passengers.  It asserts that there were no hijackings or hijackers and challenges the reader’s assumptions of this tragedy.

This is one book destined to provide answers because it asks the right questions.

For example, we may still argue about what hit the Pentagon, but now we can ask whether Flight 77 even took off and if so, who boarded it.  Then we can ask where anyone got the idea that passengers boarded.  The official story has many cracks in it, but the way to defeat it is through a new series of questions and answers that leads to a new narration of this event.

Those of us who want the truth must be prepared to face the facts, discard theories that no longer work and acknowledge new points of view.  Read, question and challenge Planes without Passengers to create a more accurate version of events before the official lies become our history.

Planes without Passengers: the Faked Hijackings of 9/11 is available at Amazon and other retailers!
3 Comments