Planes without Passengers, the 2nd edition takes from the first edition the proven theory that no hijackings took place on 9/11 and goes further by concluding that the passengers were really agents who assisted with the plot.
The book's conclusions are based primarily upon two facts: (1) the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS), which maintains information on all commercial flights in the United States, in its original form, stated clearly that while United 175 and United 93 were scheduled to fly and flew on 9/11/01, American 11 and American 77 were not scheduled and did not fly and (2) ACARS, a system much like electronic mail and GPS, shows that United 175 and United 93 were flying over the Midwestern part of the United States long after their supposed "crashes" on the east coast.
Agents pretending to be passengers were seen at the Cleveland Hopkins Airport late that morning. They walked toward A NASA building to make calls to the media to straighten out an impression many had that the Internet reported that United 93 had landed in Cleveland.
The author says in the Afterword that the United States' public is not ready to hear this message. People talk about corruption in high places and how they want change but most are ultimately too comfortable with the status quo to change it.
CLICK ON IMAGE TO FIND OUT MORE OR TO BUY!
Planes without Passengers Timeline of 9/11 Events
Appendix B – Timeline
Codes for Sources:
HC = historycommons.org
BTS = Bureau of Transportation Statistics
R=9/11 Official Report
DS=Der Spiegel magazine; BG=Boston Globe
USA=USA Today
CM=Local Cleveland media
All times Eastern time zone
7:30 A.M. – Passengers seen waiting in line in front of Gate 26 at Boston (DS)
7:40 A.M. – 11 “pushes back” from Gate 26 in Boston (BG)
7:45 A.M. – 11 “wheels off” from Gate 32 according to anonymous airport employee (BG)
7:58 A.M. – 175 with tail # N612UA “pushes back” from Gate in Boston (BTS)
7:59 A.M. – 11 “wheels off” from Boston (HC, DS)
8:02 A.M. – 93 “pushes back” from Gate in Newark (HC)
8:09 A.M. – 77 “pushes back” from Gate in Dulles (R)
8:14 A.M. – 175 “wheels off” from Boston (HC)
8:20 A.M. – 77 “wheels off” from Dulles (HC)
8:23 A.M. – 175 with tail # N612UA “wheels off” from Boston (BTS)
8:25 A.M. – 1989 “wheels off” from Boston (BTS)
8:28 A.M. – 93 “wheels off” from Newark (BTS)
8:42 A.M. – 93 “wheels off” from Newark (HC)
8:42 A.M. – some sources say this is the time of 175’s first sign of deviation from flight plan
8:46 A.M. – World Trade Center 1 (north tower) struck (HC)
8:52 A.M. – Air Traffic Controllers lose contact with 175
9:03 A.M. – World Trade Center II (south tower) is struck (HC)
9:35 A.M. – 93 nears Cleveland, then turns south away from it
9:37 A.M. – Explosion at Pentagon (HC)
9:45 A.M. – FAA orders all planes to land
10:03 – 10:10 A.M. – Crash at Shanksville, PA (seven minute discrepancy) (HC)
10:10 A.M. – First plane of two mystery planes (1989) lands in Cleveland (USA)
10:45 A.M. – Second plane of two mystery planes (175) lands in Cleveland (CM)
Planes without Passengers: The Faked Hijackings of 9/11
Dean Hartwell's new book, Planes without Passengers: The Faked Hijackings of 9/11, will come out in 2011. Here is his preface:
I do not know if we can ever discover the whole truth about 9/11. I simply present my work as a report that tells what most likely happened to the planes and passengers associated with the event. I have limited my scope to ascertaining what planes were used, how they were used and the role that the passengers played.
One reading my work will NOT find out, for example, what hit the World Trade Center buildings or the Pentagon. These and other issues like it are best left to those with specific scientific knowledge and aptitude. I do, though, say what did not strike them.
We are about to observe the tenth anniversary of this horrific event and attention given to it may never be higher for all we now know. It is simply a matter of catching that attention while I can. So now that I have your attention, here is my hope for you: I want you to take what I say seriously enough to read it all and critically enough to challenge it.
What distinguishes this book from others on the topic of 9/11?
The book takes risks to present its case to the reader. For instance, by suggesting that the passengers were not victims but rather people who knew something about the plot ahead of time will not make this book popular for those who find this sort of talk unsettling. I follow what I sincerely believe to be the truth knowing that the truth is not always kind because I want to know what happened to the passengers.
What led me to write this book?
In the ten years since the events of September 11, 2001, I have seen those events from different angles. Until 2005, I never seriously questioned the official version of nineteen Al-Qaeda hijackers and four flights of passengers smashing into landmark buildings and the ground in Shanksville, Pennsylvania. After reading books by David Ray Griffin, Michael Ruppert and others, I started to formulate questions about the Bush Administration's handling of the events.
By 2006, I started to write critically of the official story, citing, among other things, the Bush Administration's failure to keep its initial promise to provide proof of Osama bin Laden's guilt. The following year, I wrote a long essay about Vice President Cheney's involvement in the crimes of 9/11. This essay, "Indictment of Conspiracy," became a chapter in a book I published in August 2009 Dead Men Talking: Consequences of Government Lies, which also criticized the official theories of the Kennedy brother murders.
Readers of my previous efforts, such as Dead Men Talking and the essay Misdirection: Following the Plot, Execution and Cover-up of 9/11 Crimes, will note that I have changed my point of view on some issues. Truth seeking is usually a process of sorting through assertions and I made it a point to post my essays (the drafts of this book) on the Internet to get feedback from people with differing viewpoints, some of which began to appeal to me.
Since that book's publication, I have focused upon what happened to the planes and the passengers. My key determination was the significance of Bureau of Transportation records indicating that, of the four alleged flights, only United 175 and United 93 were actually scheduled and recorded as having taken off that day.
The Burden of Proof Is on Me
As I have selected the topic and have chosen to indict the official theory with my accusations, I accept the burden of proof. In general, I will prove that no passengers were hijacked or killed on September 11, 2001.
Specifically, as a way to prove this proposition, I will answer the following questions and more:
How many planes were used in the plot?
Which ones had passengers and which ones did not?
What happened to passengers from these flights after they left the planes?
So here I am with the best story that I have come up with yet about the issues that I believe are most important. The reader is invited to think critically and make their own conclusion.
RSS Feed